So, it is actually meaningless to ask what caused the Big Bang to happen - there was no Universe in which that cause could have existed. The Big Bang is the moment that space and time (or 'space-time') came into existence. This is the reason theories of pre-Big Bang matter are faulty — time began with the Big Bang before which no natural event could have taken place, including the Big Bang. The idea of 'nothing' is philosophically controversial — see chapter IV of Henri Bergson's book Creative Evolution. However, both possibilities - that time simply began, or that an infinite amount of time has elapsed - provoke . Mr bojowald without defining a beginning time means nothing so saying there was a Big Bang before the Big Bang as a theory does little to advance thinking on the topic without at least trying to anchor it to a definition of beginning. But other physicists have argued there's something beyond the Big Bang. Perhaps those universes co exist for a time, side by side or overlapping. There is nothing south of the South Pole so there was nothing around before the Big Bang." Hawking had previously said that events that happened before the Big Bang "have no consequences that can be observed," so there is no way to measure what happened, according to Tech Times . Perhaps like us, the universe and god has no pre big bang Concept of its existence before big bang, because there was nothing, other than the building blocks created by parent universes. It would seem that the source of answers to the question of whether it was "something" before the Big Bang, lies in answering the question of whether there was a lapse of time before the Big Bang. The big bang singularity would be even more drastically of this sort. In this view, the Big Bang arises from an almost. There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the Big Bang," Hawking said. It expanded and, from the cooling debris, there congealed galaxies - islands of stars of which our Milky Way is one among about two trillion. This is the basis for our work week ( Exodus 20:8 ). The Big Bang is the defining narrative of modern cosmology: a bold declaration that our universe had a beginning and has a finite age, just like the humans who live within it. From what I understand, time emerges as a result of the big bang, meaning that there is no "before" the big bang, time is not a infinite line from left to right with the big bang as a point in it, rather, what we call "time" is the perception we have from the interactions that happen within the universe. "There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the Big Bang," he said. Hawking only recently gave his own take in an interview with Neil deGrasse Tyson, where he likened the space-time dimensions of the Big Bang to the South Pole. It was the birth of space and time: a way . The Big Bang model - a model in science is a simplification of reality, but nonetheless quite faithful - has come from a great many observations and reflections (theories) for about a century. It just seemed that way . Everything happens after the creation of time . Although that seems impossible, its the mathematical veiw of the theory. He said that a very long time ago, the universe started as just a single point. It just seemed that way from mankind's perspective." No one "knows" but there is a fairly large base of really complicated cosmological science and math involved.To analyze what came "before" the Big Bang, you have to accept a different structure to time. According Tim Maudlin, professor of philosophy at New York University, modern cosmologists must consider two possibilities: that the universe was born of out nothing, or that the Big Bang was preceded by 'another state'. That's Okay for me if nothing is invisible cause I can't see air also. But it is effectively silent on why or how that first massive expansion . The big bang is conceived as being the beginning of space and time, with those two not being distinguishable at first. Paradoxical though it might seem, a total absence of matter might have managed to give rise to all the matter we see around us in our Universe. The Big Bang was not the beginning. One of the biggest misconceptions in science is that the Big Bang came out of nothing - according to astrophysicist Michelle Thaller, this is not correct. Before that point, there was really no material in any familiar sense of the word. This allowed for the concept of material realism that matter and energy were basically eternal and self existent. Presently there is no agreed upon answer. That's what's left over when all the matter in a universe has been consumed into black holes, which have in turn boiled away into photons . I know its weird, but the changeable nature of time is something accepted by the larger scientific community. At some instant, this energy was transformed into the fundamental particles from which arose all the matter we observe today. However, scientists are intrigued by what was there before the "explosion" when there was supposed to be nothing. Perhaps those universes co exist for a time, side by side or overlapping. He explained that Einstein's Theory of Relativity insists space and time form a continuum. The key assumption of this model is that just before the Big Bang, space was filled with an unstable form of energy, whose nature is not yet known. "How did Nothing" look like? 13.8 billion years ago right before the . Let me assume there was "Nothing" before big bang . Xavier Gervais asked the Naked Scientists: Hello! There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing before the Big Bang" Hawking said. But seriously: what was there before the Big Bang? That finite age, in turn, is defined by the evidence that universe is expanding (again, and unfortunately, many of us are familiar with that feeling as well). . Recorded live from the shows in Preston and Reading they tackle questions of dark energy, the . There is nothing south of the South Pole so there was nothing around before the Big Bang." Hawking had previously said that events that happened before the Big Bang "have no consequences that can be observed," so there is no way to measure what happened, according to Tech Times . What happened before the Big Bang? Genesis tells us that God created the stars on the fourth day—three days after the earth was created. "There was never a Big Bang that produced something from nothing. In a nutshell, it is impossible to measure events before the Big Bang because time in . He explained that Einstein's Theory of Relativity insists space and time form a continuum curved by the matter and energy in it. In other words, for there to be a concept of time, something has to be able to exist in different states. It just seemed that way from mankind's perspective," Hawking said, hinting that a lot of what we believe is derived from a human-centric perspective, which might limit the scope of human . I fail to see the dilemma. In episode 2 Brian and Robin are joined by a very special guest, fellow particle physicist and Brian's regular co-author, Professor Jeff Forshaw. That's Okay for me if nothing is invisible cause I can't see air also. Our universe may have had a life before this violent moment of creation. So let's think further back. The Universe has not existed forever. noun - Used in some Sci-Fi, the Zero Mass Theory is a theory that suggests there is a net total of zero mass in the universe. Make your own professional website at: http://squarespace.com/secondthoughtWhat Came Before the Big Bang? The universe is a very big place, and it's been around for a very long time. That "obsession" over the universe's origins, Vilenkin says, "has never left me. He further added, "There was never a Big Bang that produced something from nothing. But now some scientists believe that was not really the beginning. There is nothing south of the South Pole so there was nothing around before the Big Bang." More on Stephen Hawking:What Stephen Hawking would say to Donald Trump on the travel ban and climate change. The big bang is conceived as being the beginning of space and time, with those two not being distinguishable at first. This might seem like a bit of a cheat, but there are other good . "There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the Big Bang." That's it. This is the Big Bang theory. In other words, it leads to a hot Big Bang that arises from an inflationary state, not a singularity. First there was Nothing, then there was Everything, and there was a cause. - Second ThoughtModern science seems to agree that . Horizon takes the ultimate trip into the unknown, to explore a dizzying world of cosmic bounces, rips and multiple universes, and finds out what happened before the big bang. Quotes tagged as "big-bang" Showing 1-30 of 113. The Big Bounce would make a departure from western civilization's view of reality since St. Augustine, because it would recognize that time actually existed before the universe as we know it. Time did not exist prior to the big bang. "Before the beginning of time" is not a phrase that can be given a meaning within the cosmology of big bang theory. But the . The conventional answer to that question is usually, "There is no such thing as 'before the Big Bang.'" That's the event that started it all. What was there before the big bang? "Ordinary real time is replaced by imaginary time," he says. In contrast, the big bang model claims that the universe and earth formed over billions of years. "There was nothing around before the Big, Big Bang," Hawking said. The Big Bang theory does not say "nothing existed beforehand." Since time began with the universe, it's not even clear that the idea of "before the Big Bang" makes sense. "Asking what came before the Big Bang is meaningless, according to the no-boundary proposal, because there is no notion of time available to refer to," Hawking said in another lecture at the Pontifical Academy in 2016, a year and a half before his death. Perhaps twin universes are born, with alternative outcomes and development and . In this view, the Big Bang arises from an almost. Do You Believe There Was Nothing Before The Big Bang? The next time you complain that there is nothing on, remember that you can always watch the birth of the universe.". Reading Time: 2 mins read A A. "There was never a Big Bang that produced something from nothing. Anyone who tells you "the Big Bang theory says the universe came from nothing" is a religious Creationist, has never seen the inside of a university physics class, or both. It just seemed that way from mankind's perspective." (Not to mention the dubious nature of the notion that matter existed without any space in . Then, in a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second, it exploded outward, doubling and re-doubling and re-doubling in size at a rate faster than the speed of light in a phenomenon physicists call inflation. March 5, 2018. in News. "Nothing was around before the Big, Big Bang," Hawking said. He coined the term "Big Bang" to describe the event in which our universe was born, while explaining a rival theory, the Steady State theory, in a radio talk in 1949 Image via . In that universe was a big cloud of gases. Paradoxical though it might seem, a total absence of matter might have managed to give rise to all the matter we see around us in our universe. Can science explain . Inflation reproduces all of the successes of the hot Big Bang; there's nothing that the hot Big Bang accounts for that inflation can't also account for. Alan Guth et al in inflation theory - argue what seems to be the universe created from nothing but now inflation theory combined with multiverse defines what was there before the Big Bang. Before the hot Big Bang, the early . Imagine there was nothing but one solid sphere sitting in space, never changing (and no observer). That instant marks what we call the Big Bang. Before the Big Bang there was no space or time. The name stuck, even though it is somewhat inappropriate. He explains that, according to Einstein's Theory of Relativity, space and time form a continuum curved by the matter and energy in it. Hawking offered a simple and direct answer. The 'Big Bang' is a pejorative term introduced by Fred Hoyle to show his contempt for a rival hypothesis to his own Steady State hypothesis. It is the prevailing cosmological model explaining the evolution of the observable universe from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale form. I want to see "Nothing" which means it does not exist. Let me assume there was "Nothing" before big bang . "We also say that space and time both started at the Big Bang and therefore there was nothing before it." The statement that space and time did not exist prior to the Big Bang appears to present a logical impossibility, at least with respect to time. He said the universe stretched and expanded to get as big as it is now, and that it could keep on stretching. There is a phase before the big bang in this cosmological model, and it is possible to know about that phase of the universe by studying the physics of present phase of our universe. . 6.7k. The first long-lived matter particles of any kind were protons and neutrons, which together make up the atomic nucleus. For Hawking, therefore, the beginning of the universe is best described by a Euclidean approach. In many models for inflation, as in some of the older Big Bang theories, this is the only Universe that exists . What an Idea! Born in the Soviet Union in 1949 and raised in the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv, Vilenkin got hooked on cosmology in high school, after reading about the Big Bang in a book by Sir Arthur Eddington. Newsletter. The Big Bang theory proposes. Hawking said 'nothing was around before the Big Bang'. A A. I understand the concept of the expanding universe, and how we came to this conclusion, but one thing that bugs me is: how do we know that there was a big bang that created everything in the first place . Then in 1997 . "Tune your television to any channel it doesn't receive and about 1 percent of the dancing static you see is accounted for by this ancient remnant of the Big Bang. The thinking is that if space-time were created in the big bang, then time itself is created in the big bang, and there is no "before" the big bang. Today most cosmologists believe the universe will carry on expanding until all the stars burn out, leaving nothing but their cold dead remains . My question is about astronomy, more specifically the Big Bang. Around 13.82 billion years ago, matter, energy, space - and time - erupted into being in a fireball called the Big Bang. The Big Bang theory proposes that a tiny speck of matter and energy began to grow, bringing about the birth of our universe about the universe billions of years ago. In this scenario, what we know as the Big Bang was sparked by something else happening before it — the Big Bang was not a beginning, but one part of a larger process. It's saying there was time before the big bang." . In 1927, an astronomer named Georges Lemaître had a big idea. In contrast, the big bang model claims that stars existed billions of years before the earth. Paul Davies 4:00 am Tue May 20, 2014. There was no such epoch as "before the big bang," because time began with the big bang, says physicist and astrobiologist Paul Davies. There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing before the Big Bang" Hawking said. Perhaps twin universes are born, with alternative outcomes and development and . — Jackson. According to TechTimes, Hawking says during the show that before the Big Bang, time was bent — "It was always reaching closer to nothing but didn't become nothing," according to the article.. The Big Bang theory describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature. I fail to see the dilemma. So Nothing is invisible with human eyes. (a) General relativity alone. The idea was that the big bang would be followed by a big crush. That's what's left over when all the matter in a universe has been consumed into black holes, which have in turn boiled away into photons . But whether it as a Big Bang or a Big Bounce, the question of what existed before our present universe remains an open question. The universe would expand for a time and then contract forming another big band. There was something before the Big Bang and that something is what we will have in our future,' Penrose . The information that exists in our observable Universe, that we can access and measure, only . In this view, the Big Bang arises from an almost nothing. It was born. the actual theory is that there is positive matter and negative matter, and when the total negative and positive mass is added together, they cancel out to zero. There was never a 'before the big bang'. The hot Big Bang, as it was first conceived, wasn't just a hot, dense, expanding state, but represented an instant where the laws of physics break down. . There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the Big Bang," Hawking said. In Hawking's view, before the Big Bang, there existed simply nothing. There are thus two standpoints from which we can consider the question of whether Big Bang theory says the universe came from nothing: from (a) the simplified standpoint that uses general relativity alone, and from (b) the more complete—but murkier—standpoint that uses quantum gravity. Hawking offered a simple and direct answer. "There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the big bang." The idea here, if I'm understanding correctly, is that the universe didn't exist, and then it . "How did Nothing" look like? There was absolutely nothing before the Big Bang, according to British physicist Stephen Hawking, who explained what happened prior to the existence of our universe. I'll start by saying you have a very interesting site with great articles! 6.7k. "It would be like asking what lies south of the South Pole." In this scenario, what we know as the Big Bang was sparked by something else happening before it — the Big Bang was not a beginning, but one part of a larger process. Neil Swidey of the Boston Globe writes, "The Big Bang theory offers an explanation for how the early universe expanded and cooled and how matter congealed, from a primordial soup into stars, planets, and galaxies. "Before the beginning of time" is not a phrase that can be given a meaning within the cosmology of big bang theory. There is nothing south of the South Pole, so there was nothing around before the Big Bang." "There was never a Big Bang that produced something from nothing.